Two weeks before the G7 Summit of June
4, 5 in Brussels, FIAN International raises grave human rights
concerns about the G8 initiative "New Alliance for Food Security
and Nutrition in Africa" in a policy paper published today.
Titled "G8 New Alliance for Food
Security and Nutrition in Africa: A Critical Analysis from a Human
Rights Perspective", the policy paper argues that this
initiative ignores general human rights principles and contradicts a
human rights-based framework in key issues relevant for those most
affected by hunger and malnutrition: small-scale food producers. FIAN
calls on the G8 governments to stop this public-private partnership
initiative that includes more than 150 companies - among them the
biggest transnational corporations in the food and agriculture
sector. Moreover, FIAN highlights the G8 initiative also ignores
general human rights principles, like effective participation, and
lacks human rights risk analyses and reference to adequate
accountability mechanisms.
FIAN criticizes the G8 initiative as
bluntly equating the opening of agriculture and food markets to
foreign investors with combating hunger and malnutrition. An explicit
expression of this erroneous understanding is the "success"
indicators of the initiative: in most of the New Alliance Cooperation
Frameworks for countries, the World Bank Doing Business Index and
"increased private investments" are the key indicators.
This alone shows the initiative is excessively biased towards the
corporate sector.
FIAN's policy paper directly contrasts
policy actions of the G8 initiative in four key areas: seeds, land,
social protection/income, and nutrition with a human rights
framework.
The results speak for themselves: For
example, where the UN-Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food asks
governments to implement farmers' rights (as defined in the
International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources), the G8-led
initiative pushes for the "implementation of national seed
regulation" for greater private sector involvement.
Similarly, where the human right to
adequate food and nutrition includes improved access to land for
small-scale food producers "to feed oneself" and for those
groups directly affected by land grabbing, the corporate-driven
agenda of the G8 initiative is concerned about an easy and cheap
process of land allocation for investors.
An increase of private sector
involvement is furthermore evident in the area of social protection -
an area which has traditionally been the sole responsibility of the
state. The role of the state in relation to social protection is
reduced through the creation of a climate beneficial to foreign
investment by formulating corporate-friendly policy frameworks and
opening up social protection-related areas to private investors.
Also, the income-generating measures propagated by the G8 need to be
assessed carefully due primarily to the fact that the strategy of the
Alliance is geared toward land acquisition for private corporations
focusing on large-scale, capital-intensive, and extensive agriculture
which requires reduced labor input. Furthermore, the G8's simplistic
understanding of the nutritional dimension of food production has
resulted in the proposal of a limited economic model. It neglects the
fact that food and nutrition security does not simply entail the
increase of caloric intake, but rather a consistent access to diverse
and nutritious diets (in terms of quantity and quality),
culturally-adequate food, the recognition of the important role of
protecting women's rights and their nutrition, as well as access to
basic public services to ensure nutritional well-being and human
dignity.
In conclusion, FIAN's policy paper
fundamentally questions the legitimate role of the G8 in regards to
food security and nutrition. It reiterates the demand that G8
countries implement the decisions by Committee on World Food Security
(CFS), such as the Guidelines on the Governance of Tenure of Land,
Fisheries and Forests, and do not sideline and weaken the CFS as the
foremost legitimate and democratic multilateral governing body on
food security and nutrition with such an initiative.
No comments:
Post a Comment