Many
people ask: “Why should we spend funds on Africa when we are
suffering?” The developed world have actually been ripping off
Africa for the past 700 years, ever since the Portuguese began the
slave trade, all the while insisting that Africa has been the
beneficiary of this relentless exploitation.
Slavery
and the slave trade, upon which Western Europe and the United States
developed their economic superiority, were said to be positive for
Africans, whose innate inferiority meant they had no capacity to run
their own lives.
Colonialism, in turn, was the West’s ostensibly
philanthropic attempt to gift Africa with “Christianity,
Civilization and Commerce,” in return for making possible Europe’s
assorted empires.
Neo-colonialsm,
which has operated for the past 65 years since the West first “gave”
their African colonies freedom, is the stage we have all lived
through. During this period, according to Western mythology, Africa
has been the problem to which the generosity of the rich world is the
solution. You know – a goat at Christmas, the “adoption” of an
unknown child, meagre foreign aid and neoliberal economic policies.
Africa’s
multiple woes were a function of deliberate policies of exploitation
by Europe’s colonial regimes. espite mounting evidence, mass
ignorance in the West, cultivated by both elites and aid agencies,
remained dominant. Yet excellent research by sophisticated NGOs have
made indisputably clear the manifold ways in which foreign interests
consistently ripped off African countries, not least through tax
evasion and the investment privileges gained by Western corporate
interests. urces
that get transferred between rich countries and poor ones each year,
including aid, foreign investment and trade flows, as well as debt
cancellation, workers’ remittances and unrecorded capital flight.
The conclusion was categorical: The flow of money from rich countries
to poor countries, including most of Africa, pales in comparison to
the flow that runs in the other direction.
In
2012, the last year of recorded data, poor countries received a total
of $1.3-trillion (U.S.), including all aid, investment, and income
from abroad. But that same year some $3.3-trillion flowed out of
them. In other words, developing countries sent $2-trillion more to
the rest of the world than they received. Since 1980, these net
outflows add up to a staggering total of $16.3 trillion. That’s how
much money has been bled out of the global south, including Africa,
over the past few decades. Add
in the massive corruption, enabled by Western interests, plus the
violent coups and conflicts that Western interests facilitated, and
there’s only one conclusion: Rich countries aren’t developing
poor countries; poor countries are developing rich ones.
Canada
is a pretty good example. On the one hand, its government sends them
paltry amounts of foreign aid. On the other, to take only one
example, Canadian investment in African mining ventures, many of them
deeply destructive to locals, are often actively promoted by Canadian
politicians and bureaucrats.
No comments:
Post a Comment