Although Nigeria, Senegal, Mali and the Congo were all
affected by the ebola epidemic , the real devastation occurred in Liberia,
Guinea and Sierra Leone. Medical facilities were overwhelmed at an alarming
rate, already-lean government purses were stretched to the limits, the courage
of health workers was tested to the brim, and normal life was ruined. In
Liberia, the outbreak left half the heads of households out of work, while
women - who account for more workers in the non-agricultural, self-employed
sectors - were among the hardest-hit. So the aid money started coming in. By
July 2015, the United Nations announced that donors had promised $5.2bn, which
far outweighed the $3.2bn the three countries said they needed to "return
to the progress of their pre-Ebola trauma".
President Ernest Bai Koroma of Sierra Leone, speaking on
behalf of the three Ebola-hit countries, said: "Humanity sometimes
displays short attention spans and wants to move to other issues because the
threat from Ebola seems over … The threat is never over until we rebuild the
health sector Ebola demolished, until we rebuild the livelihoods it
compromised."
The much-vaunted "rebuilding of livelihoods ruined by
Ebola" is far from happening. The Liberian government, whose task force destroyed
the belongings of Ebola patients, was providing no help as survivors struggled
daily for decent food, housing and employment. As Josephine Karwah, one of only
three pregnant women to survive the virus, told me, the government left
survivors "in a limbo".
Liberia's anti-corruption watchdog audited only a fraction
($15m) of the funding, and found that $800,000, most of which passed through
the defence ministry, could not be accounted for. Specific instances of
corruption included the disbursement of $600,000 for fuel, feeding, daily
subsistence allowance, communication, medical and training, tentage repair,
repair and maintenance, without supporting documents; and the payment of
$10,000 to 68 officers in 10 counties who could not be physically seen or whose
names could not be traced in the daily attendance records.
In neighbouring Sierra Leone the report of the Audit Service
of Sierra Leone unearthed a series of financial irregularities, most notably
payments to thousands of fictitious health workers, and expenses running into
several hundreds of thousands dollars without supporting documentation.
The Ebola Fund Watch report in November 2015 reveals that
although Guinea had received donation worth $330m as of November 4, 2015, there
is not one audit report on the use of the fund. The "reports of
mismanagement" suggested in this report are given credence by the former
prime minister Cellou Dalien Diallo's description of Guinea as a country where
"contracts aren't signed and investments aren't made".
In all three countries, no individual has been tried, much
less convicted, for their role in the mismanagement of money meant to save the
lives of the dying.
No comments:
Post a Comment