China’s increasing role has created unease in America and Europe. The
US and EU obviously fears losing business: African trade with China
surpassed that with America in 2009. China has participated in 16 U.N.
peacekeeping missions in Africa and is planning to create its first military base
in Djibouti. African countries also have discovered that Beijing desires what
the U.S. demanded in the past: political loyalty, resource control, investment
return. Beijing also often demands concessions for land, minerals or other
commodities in return. Moreover, it often requires use of Chinese firms, even
bringing laborers from China. This limits the economic benefit to Africa and is
seen as a new version of neocolonialism. The “Ugly Chinese” looks much like the
“Ugly American” of days gone by. Explained a recent Rand Corp. report: “Labor
unions, civil society groups and other segments of African society criticize
Chinese enterprises for their poor labor conditions, unsustainable
environmental practices and job displacement.” The Rand report says “African
perceptions of China include a mix of approval, apathy and contempt.”
President Xi Jinping recently promised African officials $60
billion in new investment. Most of the $60 billion will be concessional loans. Even
cheap loans may become a significant burden to repay. Observed The Times:
“Infrastructure projects in Nigeria have been fueled by the same manic lending
that has also created mountains of debt for China’s economy at home.”
Inevitable defaults will cost both Africa and China.
Moreover, Africa long has been awash in “aid” from
multilateral development banks, but much of that has been stolen or wasted.
Beijing’s experience so far is no different. For instance, more than $1 billion
essentially vanished, noted the Economist magazine, after being invested in a
palm oil plantation in a region where “there were no roads, the river was
barely navigable and villagers were hostile.” Because of the lack of
conditionality, observed Brad Parks of the research lab AidData, “African
officials know that they have more leeway with Beijing’s money, and they use it.”
No comments:
Post a Comment