Isn’t socialism some sort of utopian fantasy proposal?
What
we do know is that the reality today is 80 people possess the same quantity of
wealth as 3.5 billion and there exists many painful truths about economic
injustices and the increasing gap between the rich and poor, the shocking condition of men, women and children
and the rise of political corruption. There is now posed a direct threat to the
planet itself where capitalism destroys the planet and necessitates the
extraction and burning of fossil fuels at a wildly unsustainable rate. Moreover,
such policies and practices do not place the blame where it rightly lies but
accuses working-class people for personal failure rather than a failure of the
system. The machinery of government and its institutions are now commanded and controlled
by corporate zombies, the walking brain-dead who have created a world of horror
and fear. People are being turned into fools because we believe the lies that
are fed to us.
Politics matters only when it changes the way people think,
but it must also do more. It must not only inform, but also provoke people to
act, to take collective solidarity action. We, in the Socialist Party, should find
ways to make education central to politics, to develop new strategies and
tactics of collective resistance.
The myth that African agriculture needs help from rich
Western countries, is constantly spun out by the media, investors, agribusiness
companies and other transnationals. The ‘Africa needs our help’ narrative, the
game is played so that a handful of truths are used to smuggle some hugely
significant lies past unsuspecting governments, NGOs and civil society.
It is true that one in four people in Sub-Saharan Africa are
undernourished, and that Africa has the lowest levels of agricultural
productivity in the world, with extremely low levels of inputs like
fertilizers, improved seeds and irrigation. It is also true that high
population growth rates, high levels of poverty, poor infrastructure and low
levels of investment have compounded the problem and made food difficult to
access for millions of people. It is certainly true that millions of people in
Africa suffer from hunger and malnutrition. But the false conclusion is that
with the financial and technical help provided by rich countries and
international development agencies – such as the $10 billion of ‘responsible
private investments’ committed through the New Alliance to date – employment
and food production will receive a huge boost and Africa will finally be able
to feed itself. Crucially missing from this analysis is as why this has
happened in a continent that used to be self-sufficient in food in the 1960s.
There are two main reasons for this, and they point to a
very different solution to the problem of African poverty.
Firstly, Africa’s agricultural production was designed during
the colonial era to benefit rich countries in the North with their enormous
appetite for raw materials and luxury (non-staple) foods. In 2011, the top five
exports out of Africa (by value) were cocoa beans, coffee, cotton, rubber and
tobacco; more useful for satisfying rich consumers than feeding poor
communities.
Secondly, African countries have been forced to deregulate
their trade by rich countries and financial institutions like the International
Monetary Fund and World Bank. These institutions continue to lend money to
developing countries while encouraging them to privatize public services and
deregulate their economies. So, countries end up importing staple foods like
wheat, palm oil, maize, sugar and soya-bean oil – crops largely produced by
rich countries in the North, which can afford to heavily subsidize their
agricultural sector. They have also opened up Africa to agribusiness companies
that are rapidly increasing their control of resources such as land, water and
labour.
The media, transnational corporations and government
agencies tell us that Africa needs GM technology and chemical fertilizers to
increase crop yields. What they don’t tell us is that the use of GM seeds
actually leads to falling crop yields in the long term, and the increased use
of pesticides and herbicides. Ignored is the fact that more and more evidence
has been pouring in which shows that sustainable agriculture – or agroecology –
can produce yields comparable to, and often larger than, industrial
agriculture. But that’s not all. There are also huge positive knock-on effects
of agroecology, such as increasing biodiversity, increasing income and
employment opportunities, reducing the gender gap, improving health and
nutrition, and helping to mitigate climate change.
What we need to do is challenge the myth of
corporate-controlled agriculture or calling for reform of the aid system and unfair trade
agreements but instead promote the principles of agroecology and food
sovereignty to help people regain control of Africa’s food system and that is
only possible by replacing the exploitative global economic system - capitalism.
The peoples of Africa and the rest of the world need socialism. It can only be achieved globally.
No comments:
Post a Comment