China’s foreign minister Wang Yi, on a five-nation tour of
Africa, insisted “I want to make clear one point, that is, China will never
follow the track of western colonists and all cooperation with Africa will
never come at the expense of the ecology, environment or long-term interests of
Africa.” His remarks were made to Chinese Central Television while Wang was in
Kenya, where Chinese firms are carrying out a $653m (£430m) expansion of the
main airport in the capital, Nairobi.
A diplomatic cable, published via WikiLeaks in 2010 and not
intended for public consumption, had an US official suggesting a less than altruistic
purpose: “China is a very aggressive and pernicious economic competitor with no
morals. China is not in Africa for altruistic reasons. China is in Africa for
China primarily.”
Richard Poplak, Daily
Maverick correspondent and co-author of a forthcoming book examining China’s
relationship with the continent, concurs.
“Those are wonderful sentiments, but they don't really stand
up to scrutiny. On the many projects I've visited on the continent being built
by Chinese state-owned enterprises – which is to say companies executing
Chinese foreign policy whims – the environmental assessments have been poor or
non-existent. For the foreign ministry's statements to have any resonance,
Chinese state-owned enterprises need to transparently adhere to global best
practices, or spare us the rhetoric. I'm not saying the Chinese are 'worse'
than those from whom the foreign minister is distancing his country. I'm saying
they're no better, until they prove otherwise.”
Ross Anthony, interim director of Stellenbosch University’s
Centre for Chinese Studies, who told the Daily Maverick that the lofty language
doesn’t necessarily match China’s hard-nosed business approach. “Chinese
defence against ‘neo-colonialism’ is nothing new; several Chinese presidents, ministers
and ambassadors have been refuting this claim as long as (particularly) western
critics have been making it,” said Anthony.
Even if we assume that there is no hint of neo-colonialism
in China’s involvement in Africa, it does not necessarily follow that China’s
motives are pure, nor that Africa will benefit from its presence here.
“What I have witnessed, from talks with academics and
business people, is that the relation seems to be placed on a more equal level,
on the basis of mutual interest,” commented Gaia Manco, a freelance journalist
who splits her time between Johannesburg and Beijing, and who is a specialist
on the China-Africa relationship. “The key interest is making business, and
more precisely trade. So China might not be here to exploit [just] African
resources, but they are certainly here to sell Chinese products and technology,
and I will not expect Chinese business to care about any African long-term
interest, such as the establishment of African factories and businesses. So
yes, Chinese rulers and businesspeople might be right when they don't see
themselves as colonialists, but does this mean a benefit for Africa in the end?”
No comments:
Post a Comment